↓ Skip to main content

Impact of HIV-Related Stigma on Health Behaviors and Psychological Adjustment Among HIV-Positive Men and Women

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
461 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
405 Mendeley
Title
Impact of HIV-Related Stigma on Health Behaviors and Psychological Adjustment Among HIV-Positive Men and Women
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, April 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10461-006-9099-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter A. Vanable, Michael P. Carey, Donald C. Blair, Rae A. Littlewood

Abstract

HIV-related stigmatization remains a potent stressor for HIV-positive people. This study examined the relationships among stigma-related experiences and depression, medication adherence, serostatus disclosure, and sexual risk among 221 HIV-positive men and women. In bivariate analyses that controlled for background characteristics, stigma was associated with depressive symptoms, receiving recent psychiatric care, and greater HIV-related symptoms. Stigma was also associated with poorer adherence and more frequent serostatus disclosure to people other than sexual partners, but showed no association to sexual risk behavior. In a multivariate analysis that controlled for all correlates, depression, poor adherence, and serostatus disclosure remained as independent correlates of stigma-related experiences. Findings confirm that stigma is associated with psychological adjustment and adherence difficulties and is experienced more commonly among people who disclose their HIV status to a broad range of social contacts. Stigma should be addressed in stress management, health promotion, and medication adherence interventions for HIV-positive people.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 405 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 395 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 84 21%
Student > Bachelor 54 13%
Researcher 38 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 9%
Other 77 19%
Unknown 80 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 20%
Psychology 78 19%
Social Sciences 60 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Other 39 10%
Unknown 96 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#3,368,450
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#493
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,359
of 67,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.