| Title |
Percutaneous Epicardial Approach to Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.10.016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arash Aryana, Roderick Tung, André d’Avila |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 16% |
| Germany | 5 | 8% |
| Brazil | 4 | 6% |
| Spain | 4 | 6% |
| Mexico | 4 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Jordan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 19% |
| Scientists | 6 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 44% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#904,196
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#143
of 1,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,131
of 477,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#6
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.