↓ Skip to main content

Whole-body MRI of juvenile spondyloarthritis: protocols and pictorial review of characteristic patterns

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Radiology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Whole-body MRI of juvenile spondyloarthritis: protocols and pictorial review of characteristic patterns
Published in
Pediatric Radiology, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00247-015-3319-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael R. Aquino, Shirley M. L. Tse, Sumeet Gupta, Alisa C. Rachlis, Jennifer Stimec

Abstract

Spondyloarthritides are a group of inflammatory rheumatological diseases that cause arthritis with a predilection for spinal or sacroiliac involvement in addition to a high association with HLA-B27. Juvenile spondyloarthritis is distinct from adult spondyloarthritis and manifests more frequently as peripheral arthritis and enthesitis. Consequently juvenile spondyloarthritis is often referred to as enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) subtype under the juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) classification criteria. The American College of Rheumatology Treatment Recommendations for JIA, including ERA, are based on the following clinical parameters: current treatment, disease activity and the presence of poor prognostic features. The MRI features of juvenile spondyloarthritis include marrow edema, peri-enthesal soft-tissue swelling and edema, synovitis and joint or bursal fluid. Marrow edema is nonspecific and can be seen with other pathologies as well as in healthy subjects, and this is an important pitfall to consider. With further longitudinal study and validation, however, whole-body MRI with dedicated images of the more commonly affected areas such as the spine, sacroiliac joints, hips, knees, ankles and feet can serve as a more objective tool compared to clinical exam for early detection and monitoring of disease activity and ultimately direct therapeutic management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 15%
Student > Master 6 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2016.
All research outputs
#18,458,033
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#1,547
of 2,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,529
of 265,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#19
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,086 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.