↓ Skip to main content

Capturing divergence in dependency trees to improve syntactic projection

Overview of attention for article published in Language Resources and Evaluation, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Capturing divergence in dependency trees to improve syntactic projection
Published in
Language Resources and Evaluation, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10579-014-9273-4
Authors

Ryan Georgi, Fei Xia, William D. Lewis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 13%
Cyprus 1 13%
Unknown 6 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 63%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 4 50%
Computer Science 3 38%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2016.
All research outputs
#14,706,912
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Language Resources and Evaluation
#185
of 331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,187
of 258,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Language Resources and Evaluation
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 331 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.