You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Blood pressure monitoring in high-risk pregnancy to improve the detection and monitoring of hypertension (the BUMP 1 and 2 trials): protocol for two linked randomised controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034593 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Greig Dougall, Marloes Franssen, Katherine Louise Tucker, Ly-Mee Yu, Lisa Hinton, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Lucy Abel, Julie Allen, Rebecca Jane Band, Alison Chisholm, Carole Crawford, Marcus Green, Sheila Greenfield, James Hodgkinson, Paul Leeson, Christine McCourt, Lucy MacKillop, Alecia Nickless, Jane Sandall, Mauro Santos, Lionel Tarassenko, Carmelo Velardo, Hannah Wilson, Lucy Yardley, Lucy Chappell, Richard J McManus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 67% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 194 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 13% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 99 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 102 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,241,093
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#2,241
of 25,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,700
of 472,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#55
of 604 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 604 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.