| Title |
From animal to man: Tinea barbae
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Infectious Disease Reports, October 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11908-000-0073-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gregory W. Rutecki, Rebecca Wurtz, Richard B. Thomson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 33% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,067,841
of 24,223,370 outputs
Outputs from Current Infectious Disease Reports
#181
of 503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,998
of 38,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Infectious Disease Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,223,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them