↓ Skip to main content

Do waking salivary cortisol levels correlate with anesthesiologist’s job involvement?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Do waking salivary cortisol levels correlate with anesthesiologist’s job involvement?
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10877-012-9367-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Moti Klein, Natan Weksler, Yori Gidron, Eliyahu Heldman, Eugen Gurski, Otto Robert F. Smith, Gabriel M. Gurman

Abstract

Anesthetists' work carries great responsibility and can be very stressful. Cognitive appraisal plays a central role in stress responses; however, little is known about the relationship between stress appraisal and biological markers of stress, particularly among anesthesiologists. Stress response may be associated with increased levels of systemic cortisol, which can be conveniently measured in saliva and used as a marker for the extent of stress. The objective of this study was to examine the correlation between work-related cognitive variables and waking salivary cortisol, a possible stress marker, in anesthesiologists. Thirty-eight anesthesiologists were assessed for work-related thought intrusions and perceived "mental distance" between themselves and their work, using the pictorial representation of illness self-measure (PRISM), and underwent an implicit association test reflecting implicit job-stress associations. Salivary cortisol was measured twice upon awakening and an hour later, in saliva samples, using a kit based on chemoluminescence competition assay. Only implicit job-stress associations were correlated with waking cortisol (r = 0.35, p < 0.05). Furthermore, high implicit job-stress was related to elevated cortisol only among anesthesiologists reporting large "mental distance" from work, which may represent limited job involvement related to burnout. Anesthesiologists with a low degree of job involvement who have high implicit job-stress associations have higher levels of waking salivary cortisol. Further studies are necessary to assess the impact of stress management techniques on anesthesiologists' personal and professional behavior as well as on the quality of medical care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Librarian 2 5%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 32%
Psychology 6 16%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 8 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2012.
All research outputs
#18,306,425
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#486
of 657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,642
of 164,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.