| Title |
Trial overstated HRT risk for younger women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.1095421 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren Vogel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Curaçao | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 67% |
| Researcher | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 33% |
| Psychology | 1 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#581,910
of 25,220,525 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#949
of 9,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,924
of 316,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#29
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,220,525 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.