↓ Skip to main content

HPV Update: Vaccination, Screening, and Associated Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
HPV Update: Vaccination, Screening, and Associated Disease
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11606-016-3725-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan McNamara, Pelin Batur, Judith M. E. Walsh, Kay M. Johnson

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the causative agent in cervical cancer, and is associated with numerous other genital cancers, including vulvar, vaginal, and anal cancer. Primary prevention with HPV vaccination is safe and efficacious, and a recently approved HPV vaccine will provide even more extensive protection against several oncogenic HPV strains. Screening strategies for HPV are rapidly evolving, reflecting the essential role that HPV infection plays in cervical cancer. This article highlights new evidence regarding the efficacy of the recently approved 9-valent HPV (9vHPV) vaccine and the use of primary high-risk HPV testing in cervical cancer screening. We consider the utility of urinary HPV testing in routine clinical practice and review current guidelines regarding anal HPV screening.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 20%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 7 7%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 28 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 33 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,355,648
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,891
of 8,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,491
of 340,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#43
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.