↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Poor penmanship costs MD $225,000.

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Poor penmanship costs MD $225,000.
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, January 2000
Pubmed ID
Authors

C Hirshborn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Professor 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2020.
All research outputs
#20,604,769
of 23,192,960 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#8,461
of 8,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,705
of 108,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#33
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,192,960 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.