↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and imaging features of the room tilt illusion

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Clinical and imaging features of the room tilt illusion
Published in
Journal of Neurology, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00415-012-6536-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Sierra-Hidalgo, E. de Pablo-Fernández, A. Herrero-San Martín, E. Correas-Callero, J. Herreros-Rodríguez, J. P. Romero-Muñoz, L. Martín-Gil

Abstract

Room tilt illusion (RTI) is a transient disorder of the environmental visuo-spatial perception consisting of paroxysmal tilts of the visual scene. It is attributed to an erroneous cortical mismatch of the visual and vestibular three-dimensional coordinate maps. Thirteen subjects were included in this retrospective case series. Clinical presentation was 180º rotation of the visual scene following the coronal plane in seven patients. The most common cause for RTI in our series was posterior circulation ischaemia (five cases). Cases of endolymphatic sac tumour, critical illness neuropathy, acute traumatic myelopathy and multiple system atrophy causing RTI are reported for the first time. No case of supratentorial focal lesion was found. In order to describe the clinical and imaging features of RTI, 135 cases previously reported in the literature were reviewed along with our series. There was a male predominance (60.2 %). Mean age was 51.2 ± 20.3 years. The most common location of the injury was the central nervous system (CNS) (61.4 %). Supratentorial and infratentorial structures accounted for the same frequency of lesions. The most common aetiology was cerebral ischaemia (infarction or transient ischaemic episode; 27.7 %). These patients were significantly older and their lesions commonly involved posterior fossa structures when compared to patients with non-vascular disorders. In summary, RTI is a manifestation of several CNS and vestibular disorders, and rarely of peripheral nervous system disorders, triggered by disruption of vestibular and sensory perception or integration. Cerebral ischaemic disorders are the most common aetiology for this rare syndrome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 62 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Professor 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 39%
Neuroscience 10 15%
Psychology 8 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,188,214
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#662
of 5,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,949
of 177,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#3
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.