↓ Skip to main content

Inferring direct DNA binding from ChIP-seq

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
415 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
364 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inferring direct DNA binding from ChIP-seq
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, May 2012
DOI 10.1093/nar/gks433
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy L. Bailey, Philip Machanick

Abstract

Genome-wide binding data from transcription factor ChIP-seq experiments is the best source of information for inferring the relative DNA-binding affinity of these proteins in vivo. However, standard motif enrichment analysis and motif discovery approaches sometimes fail to correctly identify the binding motif for the ChIP-ed factor. To overcome this problem, we propose 'central motif enrichment analysis' (CMEA), which is based on the observation that the positional distribution of binding sites matching the direct-binding motif tends to be unimodal, well centered and maximal in the precise center of the ChIP-seq peak regions. We describe a novel visualization and statistical analysis tool--CentriMo--that identifies the region of maximum central enrichment in a set of ChIP-seq peak regions and displays the positional distributions of predicted sites. Using CentriMo for motif enrichment analysis, we provide evidence that one transcription factor (Nanog) has different binding affinity in vivo than in vitro, that another binds DNA cooperatively (E2f1), and confirm the in vivo affinity of NFIC, rescuing a difficult ChIP-seq data set. In another data set, CentriMo strongly suggests that there is no evidence of direct DNA binding by the ChIP-ed factor (Smad1). CentriMo is now part of the MEME Suite software package available at http://meme.nbcr.net. All data and output files presented here are available at: http://research.imb.uq.edu.au/t.bailey/sd/Bailey2011a.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 341 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 25%
Researcher 83 23%
Student > Master 45 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 7%
Professor 21 6%
Other 56 15%
Unknown 43 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 155 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 102 28%
Computer Science 12 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 2%
Other 21 6%
Unknown 54 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,332,855
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#10,970
of 27,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,141
of 176,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#86
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.