| Title |
Open Access, Open Systems: Pastoral Management of Common-Pool Resources in the Chad Basin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Ecology, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10745-012-9550-z |
| Authors |
Mark Moritz, Paul Scholte, Ian M. Hamilton, Saïdou Kari |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Researcher | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 36 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,021,826
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Human Ecology
#92
of 794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,623
of 289,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Ecology
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.