↓ Skip to main content

Characterised and Projected Costs of Nonindigenous Species in Canada

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
207 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Characterised and Projected Costs of Nonindigenous Species in Canada
Published in
Biological Invasions, January 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10530-005-0236-y
Authors

Robert I Colautti, Sarah A Bailey, Colin D. A. van Overdijk, Keri Amundsen, Hugh J. MacIsaac

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 7 2%
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 292 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 74 23%
Student > Master 56 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 15%
Student > Bachelor 40 13%
Other 20 6%
Other 43 14%
Unknown 35 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 165 52%
Environmental Science 69 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 17 5%
Unknown 50 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,692,589
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#552
of 2,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,761
of 177,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.