↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacological evaluation of synthetic cannabinoids identified as constituents of spice

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Toxicology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacological evaluation of synthetic cannabinoids identified as constituents of spice
Published in
Forensic Toxicology, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11419-016-0320-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cornelius Hess, Clara T. Schoeder, Thanigaimalai Pillaiyar, Burkhard Madea, Christa E. Müller

Abstract

In recent years, many synthetic cannabinoid (CB) receptor agonists have appeared on the market as constituents of herbal incense mixtures known as "spice". Contrary to the declared use, they are perorally consumed as a replacement for marijuana to get "high". In many cases, detailed information on the physicochemical and pharmacological properties of the synthetic compounds found in spice preparations is lacking. We have now evaluated a large series of heterocyclic compounds, 1,3-disubstituted indole and 2-azaindole derivatives known or assumed to be CB1 receptor agonists, many of which have previously been identified in forensic samples. The mainly observed structural variations to circumvent restriction by law were bioisosteric exchanges of functional groups in known CB1 agonists. We analyzed the structure-activity relationships of compounds at human CB1 and CB2 receptors based on affinities obtained in radioligand binding studies, and determined their efficacy in cAMP accumulation assays. Moreover, we investigated the activities of the compounds at the orphan G protein-coupled receptors GPR18 and GPR55 both of which are known to interact with cannabinoids. Most of the investigated compounds behaved as potent full agonists of CB1 and CB2 receptors with affinities in the low nanomolar to subnanomolar concentration range. Some compounds were moderately potent GPR55 antagonists, while none interacted with GPR18. Most derivatives were predicted to cross the blood-brain barrier as determined by bioinformatics tools. These data are useful for assessing synthetic cannabinoids and will be helpful for predicting pharmacological properties of novel compounds that appear on the illicit drug market.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 121 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 17%
Student > Master 19 16%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Other 9 7%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 26 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 31 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2018.
All research outputs
#6,239,495
of 25,320,147 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Toxicology
#73
of 407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,514
of 335,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Toxicology
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,320,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.