| Title |
Technology-enabled knowledge translation: building a framework for collaboration.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, March 2003
|
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kendall Ho, Arun Chockalingam, Allan Best, Geoff Walsh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 50 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 25% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,094,491
of 23,192,960 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1,527
of 8,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,198
of 60,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,192,960 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.