Title |
The Effect of Hepatic Impairment on Outcomes in Phase I Clinical Trials in Cancer Subjects
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, November 2016
|
DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-0449 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Aaron S. Mansfield, on behalf of the NCI Organ Dysfunction Working Group, Michelle A. Rudek, Diana Vulih, Gary L. Smith, Pamela Jo Harris, S. Percy Ivy |
Abstract |
Purpose The NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program sponsors hepatic dysfunction phase 1 clinical trials (HDCT) and phase 1 clinical trials (P1CT) to determine safe doses and schedules of antineoplastic therapeutics. We sought to compare clinical outcomes between these trial types while stratifying by hepatotoxic agents. Experimental design Individual subject data were extracted from the records of 51 NCI-sponsored HDCT and P1CT. The NCI's Organ Dysfunction Working Group's hepatic impairment categorization and two drug-induced liver injury (DILI) scales (FDA R ratio and Hy's law) were used to classify subjects. The number of cycles administered and treatment discontinuation reason were also evaluated and compared between groups. Results There were 513 and 1328 subjects treated on HDCT (n=9) and P1CT (n=42), respectively. There were differing patterns of DILI with significant worsening of total bilirubin in subjects on HDCT, and worsening of ALT in subjects on P1CT. Cholestatic peak patterns of liver impairment (predominant increases in alkaline phosphatase rather than transaminases) were more frequent in HDCT. Criteria for Hy's Law were met by 11 subjects on P1CT but not by any subjects on HDCT. Disease progression was the most common reason for treatment discontinuation, followed by adverse events at similar frequencies in both HDCT and P1CT. Conclusions The differential effects on hepatotoxicity suggest that underlying hepatic function may affect susceptibility to and patterns of DILI. The incorporation of additional measures of hepatic function may help identify those at highest risk of hepatotoxicity in future trials since baseline liver tests did not. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 5 | 21% |
Researcher | 5 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 25% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 46% |