| Title |
A systematic review and meta-analysis of gastric cancer treatment in patients with positive peritoneal cytology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gastric Cancer, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10120-014-0388-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlos Suhady Cabalag, Steven Tuck Foo Chan, Yui Kaneko, Cuong Phu Duong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 63% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,481,847
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from Gastric Cancer
#145
of 597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,609
of 228,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastric Cancer
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them