↓ Skip to main content

Optimal allocation of conservation effort among subpopulations of a threatened species: How important is patch quality?

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimal allocation of conservation effort among subpopulations of a threatened species: How important is patch quality?
Published in
Ecological Applications, April 2010
DOI 10.1890/08-1749.1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aliénor L. M. Chauvenet, Peter W. J. Baxter, Eve McDonald-Madden, Hugh P. Possingham

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Brazil 3 2%
India 2 1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 159 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 19%
Student > Master 28 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 12 7%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 52%
Environmental Science 40 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 30 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,800,756
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#2,853
of 3,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,690
of 100,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#24
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.