You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Typology of modifications to peer support work for adults with mental health problems: systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Psychiatry, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1192/bjp.2019.264 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashleigh Charles, Dean Thompson, Rebecca Nixdorf, Grace Ryan, Donat Shamba, Jasmine Kalha, Galia Moran, Ramona Hiltensperger, Candelaria Mahlke, Bernd Puschner, Julie Repper, Mike Slade, Richard Mpango |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 37% |
| India | 3 | 9% |
| Malta | 1 | 3% |
| Kenya | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 29% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,626,338
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Psychiatry
#949
of 6,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,113
of 474,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Psychiatry
#12
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.