↓ Skip to main content

Structural requirements for the interaction of sheep insulin-like factor 3 with relaxin receptors in rat atria

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pharmacology, December 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structural requirements for the interaction of sheep insulin-like factor 3 with relaxin receptors in rat atria
Published in
European Journal of Pharmacology, December 2002
DOI 10.1016/s0014-2999(02)02662-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yean Yeow Tan, Nicola F Dawson, Andrew R Kompa, Courtney P Bond, Antonia Claasz, John D Wade, Geoffrey W Tregear, Roger J Summers

Abstract

Relaxin is a peptide with various reproductive and nonreproductive functions. The site for the peptide-receptor interaction contains two arginines (Arg) and an isoleucine (Ile) or valine (Val) residue in the B-chain with a configuration of -Arg-X-X-X-Arg-X-X-Ile/Val-X-. The sheep insulin-like peptide 3 (INSL3), a structural homologue of relaxin, also contains the n, n+4 arginines in the B-chain but they are displaced towards the carboxyl terminus by four residues (-X-X-X-X-Arg-X-X-Val-Arg-). Human INSL3 increases the activity of human relaxin in mouse bioassays. Here, we investigated whether sheep synthetic INSL3 affects the relaxin activity in rat atria. INSL3 lacked relaxin-like agonist activity but blocked the activity of relaxin and competed for relaxin binding sites at high concentrations. We also synthesized analogues of INSL3, with amino acid substitutions in the arginine-binding region. Analogues A, D and E, which have the arginines in positions identical to relaxin, showed weak relaxin-like agonist activity. These results suggest that other sites in the relaxin molecule are involved in high-affinity peptide-receptor interaction for the production of the relaxin biological responses.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Professor 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Chemistry 1 9%
Materials Science 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pharmacology
#2,351
of 8,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,213
of 135,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pharmacology
#26
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,585 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.