↓ Skip to main content

The suppressors of cytokine signalling (SOCS)

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, October 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
9 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The suppressors of cytokine signalling (SOCS)
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, October 2001
DOI 10.1007/pl00000801
Pubmed ID
Authors

B.T. Kile, W.S. Alexander

Abstract

Members of the SOCS (suppressor of cytokine signalling) family of proteins play key roles in the negative regulation of cytokine signal transduction. A series of elegant biochemical and molecular biological studies has revealed that these proteins act in a negative feedback loop, inhibiting the cytokine-activated Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK/ STAT) signalling pathway to modulate cellular responses. Although structurally related, the precise mechanisms of SOCS-1, SOCS-3 and cytokine-inducible SH2-containing protein (CIS) action vary. Direct interaction of SOCS SH2 domains with the JAK kinases or cytokine receptors allows their recruitment to the signalling complex, where they inhibit JAK catalytic activity or block access of the STATs to receptor binding sites. The defining feature of the family, the C-terminal SOCS box domain, appears dispensable for these actions but is likely to play a key role in negative regulation of signalling by targeting molecules associated with the SOCS proteins for degradation. The relevance of SOCS-mediated regulation of cytokine responses has been brought into sharp focus by the dramatic phenotypes of mice lacking these regulators. Indispensable roles for members of this family have been identified in the regulation of interferon gamma, growth hormone and erythropoietin, and the absence of SOCS-1 or SOCS-3 is lethal in mice.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 6%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 30 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 36%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 39%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 1 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#2,146
of 5,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,239
of 44,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.