You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
野球害毒論争(1911年)に見る野球イデオロギー形成の一側面 : 「日本的スポーツ観」再考試論
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Japan Journal of Sport History, March 2002
|
| DOI | 10.19010/jjshjb.15.0_61 |
| Authors |
小野瀬 剛志 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,991,738
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from The Japan Journal of Sport History
#5
of 26 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,509
of 50,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japan Journal of Sport History
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one scored the same or higher as 21 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them