| Title |
Barriers and enablers to collaborative working between GPs and pharmacists: a qualitative interview study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x708197 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Polly Duncan, Matthew J Ridd, Deborah McCahon, Bruce Guthrie, Christie Cabral |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 21 | 62% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 21% |
| Scientists | 6 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 33 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2020.
All research outputs
#974,389
of 24,576,899 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#439
of 4,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,046
of 466,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#15
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,576,899 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 466,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.