You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical characteristics and therapeutic procedure for four cases with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia receiving combined Chinese and Western medicine treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioScience Trends, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.5582/bst.2020.01030 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhenwei Wang, Xiaorong Chen, Yunfei Lu, Feifei Chen, Wei Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 33% |
| Spain | 2 | 17% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 932 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 932 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 117 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 116 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 93 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 9% |
| Other | 63 | 7% |
| Other | 203 | 22% |
| Unknown | 258 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 202 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 69 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 56 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 53 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 32 | 3% |
| Other | 212 | 23% |
| Unknown | 308 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,282,264
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from BioScience Trends
#13
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,138
of 474,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience Trends
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.