| Title |
A Randomized Trial of Peer Coach and Office Staff Support to Reduce Coronary Heart Disease Risk in African-Americans with Uncontrolled Hypertension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-012-2095-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barbara J. Turner, Christopher S. Hollenbeak, Yuanyuan Liang, Kavita Pandit, Shelly Joseph, Mark G. Weiner |
| Abstract |
Adopting features of the Chronic Care Model may reduce coronary heart disease risk and blood pressure in vulnerable populations. We evaluated a peer and practice team intervention on reduction in 4-year coronary heart disease risk and systolic blood pressure. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 31 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 27% |
| Psychology | 11 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2016.
All research outputs
#6,839,484
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,786
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,784
of 166,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#34
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.