↓ Skip to main content

Pathways to malaria persistence in remote central Vietnam: a mixed-method study of health care and the community

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Pathways to malaria persistence in remote central Vietnam: a mixed-method study of health care and the community
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-9-85
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martha Morrow, Quy A Nguyen, Sonia Caruana, Beverley A Biggs, Nhan H Doan, Tien T Nong

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 101 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 21%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Lecturer 5 5%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 26 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,481,847
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,911
of 14,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,626
of 93,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#22
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.