↓ Skip to main content

Media multitasking in adolescence

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
311 Mendeley
Title
Media multitasking in adolescence
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13423-016-1036-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew S. Cain, Julia A. Leonard, John D. E. Gabrieli, Amy S. Finn

Abstract

Media use has been on the rise in adolescents overall, and in particular, the amount of media multitasking-multiple media consumed simultaneously, such as having a text message conversation while watching TV-has been increasing. In adults, heavy media multitasking has been linked with poorer performance on a number of laboratory measures of cognition, but no relationship has yet been established between media-multitasking behavior and real-world outcomes. Examining individual differences across a group of adolescents, we found that more frequent media multitasking in daily life was associated with poorer performance on statewide standardized achievement tests of math and English in the classroom, poorer performance on behavioral measures of executive function (working memory capacity) in the laboratory, and traits of greater impulsivity and lesser growth mindset. Greater media multitasking had a relatively circumscribed set of associations, and was not related to behavioral measures of cognitive processing speed, implicit learning, or manual dexterity, or to traits of grit and conscientiousness. Thus, individual differences in adolescent media multitasking were related to specific differences in executive function and in performance on real-world academic achievement measures: More media multitasking was associated with poorer executive function ability, worse academic achievement, and a reduced growth mindset.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 306 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 55 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 13%
Student > Master 39 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Researcher 19 6%
Other 47 15%
Unknown 91 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 108 35%
Social Sciences 32 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 4%
Computer Science 6 2%
Other 40 13%
Unknown 103 33%