↓ Skip to main content

Sesame Seed Food Allergy

Overview of attention for article published in Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 835)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Sesame Seed Food Allergy
Published in
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11882-012-0267-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilan Dalal, Michael Goldberg, Yitzhak Katz

Abstract

The number of reports regarding sesame seed food allergy (SFA) has increased significantly worldwide over the past two decades, either due to a genuine increase in SFA or merely an increase in its awareness. Its prevalence is difficult to estimate due to the lack of well designed prospective population-based studies. Based on the available data, we estimate that SFA affects 0.1-0.2 % of the population, in areas where the food is available. Albeit this prevalence appears to be relatively low, it is approximately one-half of that of persistent cow's milk allergy. While only one fatality has been reported, the significant number of SFA patients presenting as anaphylaxis indicates the potential risk. Many reports based the diagnosis of SFA on sensitization criteria alone, particularly amongst atopic dermatitis patients. Elimination of sesame from the diet of these children utilizing such criteria is not justified, and may even increase the risk for developing SFA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Paraguay 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 18%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Other 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 16 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#948,958
of 23,896,578 outputs
Outputs from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#40
of 835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,076
of 166,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,896,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.