↓ Skip to main content

Rates and Correlates of HIV and STI Infection Among Homeless Women

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Rates and Correlates of HIV and STI Infection Among Homeless Women
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10461-012-0198-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol L. M. Caton, Nabila El-Bassel, Andrew Gelman, Susan Barrow, Daniel Herman, Eustace Hsu, Ana Z. Tochterman, Karen Johnson, Alan Felix

Abstract

We studied the prevalence of biologically confirmed HIV, Chlamydia, and gonorrhea in a randomly selected sample of sheltered homeless women in New York City, and explored their association with demographic, homeless history, and clinical risk factors. 329 women were randomly selected from 28 family and single adult shelters. The estimated prevalence of HIV in the study sample is 0.6 % (±0.3 %); for Chlamydia it is 6.7 % (±2.2 %); for gonorrhea it is 0.9 % (±0.04 %). A history of childhood sexual abuse, arrest history, current psychotic symptoms, and substance use disorder placed women at greater risk of infection. We consider contextual factors that may yield underestimates of HIV prevalence in our sample and discuss how a more comprehensive prevalence estimate might be constructed. Findings underscore the importance of offering HIV/STI testing, counseling, and HIV risk prevention interventions to homeless women and suggest that interventions should be tailored to the needs of specific subgroups of homeless women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 92 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 25 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 19%
Social Sciences 15 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 32 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,571,941
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#526
of 3,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,027
of 168,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#9
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.