You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genes in space: what Mojave desert tortoise genetics can tell us about landscape connectivity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-020-01251-z |
| Authors |
Kirsten E. Dutcher, Amy G. Vandergast, Todd C. Esque, Anna Mitelberg, Marjorie D. Matocq, Jill S. Heaton, Ken E. Nussear |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 18% |
| Researcher | 8 | 16% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2020.
All research outputs
#16,886,902
of 24,827,122 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#912
of 1,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,990
of 463,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#21
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,827,122 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.