Title |
Working on wellness (WOW): A worksite health promotion intervention programme
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-372 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tracy L Kolbe-Alexander, Karin I Proper, Estelle V Lambert, Marieke F van Wier, Julian D Pillay, Craig Nossel, Leegale Adonis, Willem Van Mechelen |
Abstract |
Insufficient PA has been shown to cluster with other CVD risk factors including insufficient fruit and vegetable intake, overweight, increased serum cholesterol concentrations and elevated blood pressure. This paper describes the development of Working on Wellness (WOW), a worksite intervention program incorporating motivational interviewing by wellness specialists, targeting employees at risk. In addition, we describe the evaluation the effectiveness of the intervention among employees at increased risk for cardiovascular disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 33% |
Canada | 1 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 249 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 65 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 8% |
Researcher | 21 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 8% |
Other | 42 | 16% |
Unknown | 53 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 16% |
Sports and Recreations | 23 | 9% |
Psychology | 19 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 7% |
Other | 49 | 19% |
Unknown | 58 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2012.
All research outputs
#6,712,073
of 25,310,061 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,106
of 16,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,560
of 170,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#68
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,310,061 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.