↓ Skip to main content

Randomised controlled trial of amoxycillin clavulanate in children with chronic wet cough

Overview of attention for article published in Thorax, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomised controlled trial of amoxycillin clavulanate in children with chronic wet cough
Published in
Thorax, May 2012
DOI 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201506
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Marchant, Ian Brent Masters, Anita Champion, Helen Petsky, Anne B Chang

Abstract

Despite guideline recommendations, there are no published randomised controlled trial data on the efficacy of antibiotics for chronic wet cough in children. The majority of children with chronic wet cough have protracted bacterial bronchitis (PBB), a recognised condition in multiple national guidelines. The authors conducted a parallel 1:1 placebo randomised controlled trial to test the hypothesis that a 2-week course of amoxycillin clavulanate is efficacious in the treatment of children with chronic wet cough.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 20%
Other 8 13%
Professor 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 59%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,742,613
of 24,138,997 outputs
Outputs from Thorax
#739
of 5,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,475
of 167,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thorax
#5
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,138,997 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.