You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diet and Macronutrient Optimization in Wild Ursids: A Comparison of Grizzly Bears with Sympatric and Allopatric Black Bears
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0153702 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cecily M. Costello, Steven L. Cain, Shannon Pils, Leslie Frattaroli, Mark A. Haroldson, Frank T. van Manen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 22 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,384,214
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#113,599
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,095
of 353,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,007
of 4,812 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,812 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.