| Title |
The ‘Ability’ Paradigm in Vocational Rehabilitation: Challenges in an Ontario Injured Worker Retraining Program
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10926-011-9329-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. MacEachen, A. Kosny, S. Ferrier, K. Lippel, C. Neilson, R. L. Franche, D. Pugliese |
| Abstract |
In recent years, a focus on workers' ability, rather than impairment, has guided disability management services. However, a challenge with the notion of 'ability' is identification of the border between ability and inability. This article considers this gray zone of disability management in the case of a workers' compensation vocational retraining program for injured workers in Ontario. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 24% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 24 | 23% |
| Psychology | 18 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2012.
All research outputs
#18,306,425
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#532
of 612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,900
of 125,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.