You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Calcareous nannofossil assemblage changes across the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum: Evidence from a shelf setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Micropaleontology, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.marmicro.2012.05.003 |
| Authors |
Jean M. Self-Trail, David S. Powars, David K. Watkins, Gregory A. Wandless |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 26% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 63 | 64% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,260,573
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Marine Micropaleontology
#24
of 367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,092
of 188,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Micropaleontology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 367 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them