| Title |
Impact of CD39 and purinergic signalling on the growth and metastasis of colorectal cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Purinergic Signalling, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11302-011-9228-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Beat M. Künzli, Maria-Isabell Bernlochner, Stephan Rath, Samuel Käser, Eva Csizmadia, Keiichi Enjyoji, Peter Cowan, Anthony d’Apice, Karen Dwyer, Robert Rosenberg, Aurel Perren, Helmut Friess, Christoph A. Maurer, Simon C. Robson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 23% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,664,149
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Purinergic Signalling
#39
of 373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,370
of 108,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Purinergic Signalling
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 373 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them