| Title |
Identification of a novel group of putative Arabidopsis thaliana β-(1,3)-galactosyltransferases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Molecular Biology, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11103-008-9351-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yongmei Qu, Jack Egelund, Paul R. Gilson, Fiona Houghton, Paul A. Gleeson, Carolyn J. Schultz, Antony Bacic |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 25% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,481,847
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology
#977
of 2,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,592
of 82,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,846 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.