↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis of equine gammaherpesvirus 2 and 5 infections by polymerase chain reaction

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, June 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosis of equine gammaherpesvirus 2 and 5 infections by polymerase chain reaction
Published in
Archives of Virology, June 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf01315414
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. H. Reubel, B. S. Crabb, M. J. Studdert

Abstract

Nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays were developed for the detection of equine herpesvirus 2 (EHV2) and equine herpesvirus 5 (EHV5) using the nucleotide sequences from the glycoprotein B (gB) gene of EHV2 and the thymidine kinase (TK) gene of EHV5. The simultaneous use of EHV2 specific and EHV5 specific primers in one nested amplification assay (multiplex PCR) enabled a rapid, specific and sensitive diagnosis for each virus. PCR was found to be 10(3) times more sensitive than virus isolation by cell culture for EHV2 and 10(6) for EHV5. In separate PCR assays, the routine detection limit after ethidium bromide staining was 0.6 fg for EHV2 plasmid DNA and 2.3 fg for EHV5 plasmid DNA, equivalent for both viruses to approximately 100 genome copies. The detection limits in multiplex PCR were 6 pg for EHV2 and 2.3 fg for EHV5, respectively. PCR assays were applied to studies of the epidemiology of EHV2 and EHV5 infections of racehorses and breeding mares in Victoria and New South Wales, Australia. Peripheral blood leukocytes from 31% of horses were positive for EHV2, 16% positive for EHV5, 8% positive for both viruses and 63% negative for both viruses. EHV2 PCR was also successfully used to detect EHV2 DNA in nasal secretions from horses. The multiplex PCR assay proved to be a rapid and reliable method for the simultaneous detection and differentiation of 2 related equine gammaherpesviruses.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 25%
Student > Master 3 25%
Lecturer 2 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2005.
All research outputs
#4,716,329
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#378
of 4,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,129
of 24,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,188 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.