| Title |
Two-point theory for the differential self-interrogation Feynman-alpha method
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The European Physical Journal Plus, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1140/epjp/i2012-12090-2 |
| Authors |
J. Anderson, D. Chernikova, I. Pázsit, L. Pál, S. A. Pozzi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 50% |
| Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Researcher | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 50% |
| Engineering | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2012.
All research outputs
#18,306,425
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal Plus
#584
of 882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,354
of 170,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal Plus
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.