↓ Skip to main content

Antiemetic prophylaxis in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a multicenter survey of the Gruppo Italiano Trapianto Midollo Osseo (GITMO) transplant programs

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Hematology, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antiemetic prophylaxis in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a multicenter survey of the Gruppo Italiano Trapianto Midollo Osseo (GITMO) transplant programs
Published in
Annals of Hematology, February 2020
DOI 10.1007/s00277-020-03945-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Domenico Pastore, Benedetto Bruno, Paola Carluccio, Maria Stella De Candia, Sonia Mammoliti, Carlo Borghero, Anna Chierichini, Fabio Pavan, Marco Casini, Massimo Pini, Luca Nassi, Raffaella Greco, Francesco Paolo Tambaro, Paola Stefanoni, Giuseppe Console, Francesco Marchesi, Luca Facchini, Alberto Mussetti, Michele Cimminiello, Francesco Saglio, Daniele Vincenti, Sadia Falcioni, Patrizia Chiusolo, Jacopo Olivieri, Annalisa Natale, Maura Faraci, Simone Cesaro, Serena Marotta, Anna Proia, Irene Donnini, Daniela Caravelli, Eliana Zuffa, Anna Paola Iori, Elena Soncini, Valentina Bozzoli, Giovanni Pisapia, Renato Scalone, Oreste Villani, Arcangelo Prete, Antonella Ferrari, Mariacristina Menconi, Giorgia Mancini, Federica Gigli, Gianpaolo Gargiulo, Barbara Bruno, Francesca Patriarca, Francesca Bonifazi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 13 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 15%
Engineering 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2020.
All research outputs
#15,599,316
of 23,192,960 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Hematology
#1,179
of 2,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,729
of 451,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Hematology
#29
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,192,960 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,213 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.