You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The morbid genome of ciliopathies: an update
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetics in Medicine, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41436-020-0761-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hanan E. Shamseldin, Ranad Shaheen, Nour Ewida, Dalal K. Bubshait, Hisham Alkuraya, Elham Almardawi, Ali Howaidi, Yasser Sabr, Ebtesam M. Abdalla, Abdullah Y. Alfaifi, Jameel Mohammed Alghamdi, Afaf Alsagheir, Ahmed Alfares, Heba Morsy, Maged H. Hussein, Mohammad A. Al–Muhaizea, Mohammad Shagrani, Essam Al Sabban, Mustafa A. Salih, Neama Meriki, Rubina Khan, Maisoon Almugbel, Alya Qari, Maha Tulba, Mohammed Mahnashi, Khalid Alhazmi, Abrar K. Alsalamah, Sawsan R. Nowilaty, Amal Alhashem, Mais Hashem, Firdous Abdulwahab, Niema Ibrahim, Tarfa Alshidi, Eman AlObeid, Mona M. Alenazi, Hamad Alzaidan, Zuhair Rahbeeni, Mohammed Al–Owain, Sameera Sogaty, Mohammed Zain Seidahmed, Fowzan S. Alkuraya |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Israel | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,555,608
of 25,378,799 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#1,357
of 2,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,652
of 473,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#50
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,799 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.