| Title |
A longevity cost of re-mating but no benefits of polyandry in the almond moth, Cadra cautella
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00265-008-0573-9 |
| Authors |
Kathryn B. McNamara, Mark A. Elgar, Therésa M. Jones |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Romania | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 70% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#1,389
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,395
of 82,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.