↓ Skip to main content

The mammalian DUF59 protein Fam96a forms two distinct types of domain‐swapped dimer

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Crystallographica: Section D (International Union of Crystallography - IUCr), May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The mammalian DUF59 protein Fam96a forms two distinct types of domain‐swapped dimer
Published in
Acta Crystallographica: Section D (International Union of Crystallography - IUCr), May 2012
DOI 10.1107/s0907444912006592
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai En Chen, Ayanthi A Richards, Juliana K Ariffin, Ian L Ross, Matthew J Sweet, Stuart Kellie, Bostjan Kobe, Jennifer L Martin

Abstract

Fam96a mRNA, which encodes a mammalian DUF59 protein, is enriched in macrophages. Recombinant human Fam96a forms stable monomers and dimers in solution. Crystal structures of these two forms revealed that each adopts a distinct type of domain-swapped dimer, one of which is stabilized by zinc binding. Two hinge loops control Fam96a domain swapping; both are flexible and highly conserved, suggesting that domain swapping may be a common feature of eukaryotic but not bacterial DUF59 proteins. The derived monomer fold of Fam96a diverges from that of bacterial DUF59 counterparts in that the C-terminal region of Fam96a is much longer and is positioned on the opposite side of the N-terminal core fold. The putative metal-binding site of bacterial DUF59 proteins is not conserved in Fam96a, but Fam96a interacts tightly in vitro with Ciao1, the cytosolic iron-assembly protein. Moreover, Fam96a and Ciao1 can be co-immunoprecipitated, suggesting that the interaction also occurs in vivo. Although predicted to have a signal peptide, it is shown that Fam96a is cytoplasmic. The data reveal that eukaryotic DUF59 proteins share intriguing characteristics with amyloidogenic proteins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 24%
Chemistry 5 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2012.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Acta Crystallographica: Section D (International Union of Crystallography - IUCr)
#2,254
of 2,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,164
of 176,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Crystallographica: Section D (International Union of Crystallography - IUCr)
#10
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,784 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.