↓ Skip to main content

Childhood Maltreatment in the Migraine Patient

Overview of attention for article published in Current Treatment Options in Neurology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 471)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Childhood Maltreatment in the Migraine Patient
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Neurology, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11940-016-0415-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gretchen E. Tietjen, Dawn C. Buse, Stuart A. Collins

Abstract

Maltreatment during childhood increases vulnerability to a host of health disorders, including migraine. Putative mechanisms linking maltreatment and migraine include stress-induced dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, as well as disruption of other stress-mediating homeostatic systems, including those involving endocannabinoids, monoamine neurotransmitters, oxytocin, and inflammation. Prolonged elevation of glucocorticoids alters the neural architecture of the limbic system, resulting in the structural as well as functional changes described in both maltreatment and in migraine. Although treatment trials for migraine have not stratified participants by abuse history, strategies, such as cognitive behavioral therapy, which alter stress responsivity, may be particularly effective in this subgroup. Some therapies involving the endocannabinoid, serotonergic, oxytonergic, and inflammatory systems are under investigation for migraine. Anti-epileptic drugs such as valproate and topiramate, which are FDA approved for migraine treatment, are also known to interfere with epigenetic changes induced by stress. Discerning the role for this mechanism in treatment of maltreated migraineurs may introduce another therapeutic avenue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 21 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 26%
Psychology 11 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 25 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2020.
All research outputs
#496,849
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from Current Treatment Options in Neurology
#5
of 471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,826
of 334,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Treatment Options in Neurology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them