↓ Skip to main content

A randomised, controlled trial of conventional versus automated weaning from mechanical ventilation using SmartCare™/PS

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
Title
A randomised, controlled trial of conventional versus automated weaning from mechanical ventilation using SmartCare™/PS
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00134-008-1179-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise Rose, Jeffrey J. Presneill, Linda Johnston, John F. Cade

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 153 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 20%
Other 19 12%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 40 24%
Unknown 30 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Computer Science 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 30 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,481,847
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,852
of 4,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,647
of 82,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#18
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.