You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
金と水銀の異常性をどう理解するか : 第6周期元素は相対論とf電子の影響から逃れられない(ヘッドライン:周期表を読む)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CHEMISTRY & EDUCATION, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.20665/kakyoshi.60.8_340 |
| Authors |
細矢 治夫 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 27% |
| China | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,398,152
of 25,551,063 outputs
Outputs from CHEMISTRY & EDUCATION
#9
of 266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,469
of 179,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEMISTRY & EDUCATION
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,551,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 266 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them