↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of Child Sexual Abuse in the Nordic Countries: A Literature Review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of Child Sexual Abuse in the Nordic Countries: A Literature Review
Published in
Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, January 2016
DOI 10.1080/10538712.2015.1108944
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathrine Kloppen, Siren Haugland, Carl Göran Svedin, Magne Mæhle, Kyrre Breivik

Abstract

This review examined child sexual abuse in the Nordic countries focusing on prevalence rates and victims' age and relationship to the perpetrator. The results show a prevalence of child sexual abuse (broadly defined) between 3-23% for boys and 11-36% for girls. The prevalence rates for contact abuse were 1-12% for boys and 6-30% for girls, while 0.3-6.8% of the boys and 1.1-13.5% of the girls reported penetrating abuse. The findings suggest an increased risk of abuse from early adolescence. In adolescence, peers may constitute the largest group of perpetrators. The results highlight the need for preventive efforts also targeting peer abuse. Future research should include cross-national and repeated studies using comparable methodology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 130 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 39 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 12%
Social Sciences 12 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 47 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,463,774
of 25,649,244 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Child Sexual Abuse
#108
of 601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,218
of 407,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Child Sexual Abuse
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,649,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.