| Title |
Social credit: a comprehensive literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Financial Innovation, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40854-015-0005-6 |
| Authors |
Lean Yu, Xinxie Li, Ling Tang, Zongyi Zhang, Gang Kou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,064,133
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Financial Innovation
#5
of 181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,245
of 270,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Financial Innovation
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.