↓ Skip to main content

Cache-efficient string sorting using copying

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Algorithmics, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cache-efficient string sorting using copying
Published in
Journal of Experimental Algorithmics, February 2007
DOI 10.1145/1187436.1187439
Authors

Ranjan Sinha, Justin Zobel, David Ring

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 8%
France 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Trinidad and Tobago 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 29 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 24%
Student > Master 9 24%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 24 65%
Engineering 6 16%
Chemistry 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Algorithmics
#15
of 74 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,370
of 169,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Algorithmics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 74 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.